The American dystopian science fiction shows the efficacy of time to life, in a world enabling the wealthy to live forever while the poor, like Will, have to beg, borrow, and steal enough minutes to make it through another day.
28 May 1983, Brighton, England, UK
11 October 1977, Webster Groves, Missouri, USA
20 April 2005, USA
19 January 1984, Newport Beach, California, USA
1971, Costa Mesa, California, USA
22 April 1981, Richmond, Virginia, USA
12 September 1985, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
30 April 1975, Bree, Flanders, Belgium
10 November 1985, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
10 April 1990, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, England, UK
3 December 1985, Allentown, Pennsylvania, USA
5 September 1987, Los Angeles County, California, USA
20 June 1985, Brooklyn, New York, USA
26 March 1984, Oakland, California, USA
1 May 1990, Houston, Texas, USA
31 March 1983, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
4 April 1988, Indiana, USA
June 22, 2013
Don't let the ads fool you: It has a lot on its mind.November 01, 2011
Niccol's major problem is timing: action sequences and dialogue scenes lie flat on the screen, while his tendency to play around with pacing means that any tension quickly dissipates. Life's too short.October 31, 2011
The film is beautifully shot in chilly blues and grays by cinematographer Roger Deakins, and Los Angeles locales are well chosen for futuristic effect. Most of the time, however, I found myself glancing at the clock on my own wrist.June 20, 2013
In Time is so crammed with provocative ideas it begins to feel over-crowded.October 31, 2011
Niccol's zippy direction, joined to a sleek, rich production design, keeps the movie spinning like a shiny toy.September 22, 2012
There's a lot to like about In Time, but it misses the mark for being an overly memorable experience and ends up being just an adequate sci-fi flick.September 18, 2012
"In Time" gets points for putting forth an interesting concept, but because of Niccol's inability to utilize that concept, we get a film that ends up going nowhere.December 29, 2012
Even with its thoughtful nods to "Bonnie & Clyde" and "Les Miserables," "In time" never delivers that transcendent "Blade Runner" moment, and never rises above cult classic to simple classic.March 04, 2013
One long, extended chase sequence interspersed with awkward flirting.April 12, 2012
Worry, worry and watch the clock, for 'In Time' wastes what time you've got.November 10, 2011
Clever and unsettling.October 28, 2011
A movie so consistently flat-footed, with pauses between lines of dialogue so vast, that you begin to wonder if the whole thing might be a psychological experiment of some kind.